Sunday, October 18, 2009

Your Facebook Data is For Sale (sort of)

Facebook has struggled to make money through advertising. As a way to reverse their fortunes, Facebook plans to start selling users’ personal information to market researchers. That means Facebook may use information in your profile without identifying you as an individual to third parties.

The Telegraph is reporting that social networking giant Facebook has new plans for generating revenue; offering its 150 million user database as a market research tool to corporations, “Facebook is planning to exploit the vast amount of personal information it holds on its 150m members by creating one of the world's largest market research databases”

That’s one of the criticism concerned Facebook's right, "We may share your information with third parties, including responsible companies with which we have a relationship." This was addressed by Facebook spokesman Chris Hughes who said, "Simply put, we have never provided our users' information to third party companies, nor do we intend to."

And Why not , think about it they are controlling 150 million user database and Its legal now as Facebook have changed the terms of service: Facebook's New Terms Of Service: "We Can Do Anything We Want With Your Content. Forever." http://consumerist.com/5150175/facebooks-new-terms-of-service-we-can-do-anything-we-want-with-your-content-forever

What does this mean for Facebook users, and online social marketing adherents in general? It means that more than ever, you must be careful what information you post to your online profiles. Photos, data, other media files, your associations – all’s fair in the advertising game. If you’re comfortable with that, post away. If, however, you are more cautious when it comes to how your personal information is used, think about things first.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/4413483/Networking-site-cashes-in-on-friends.html

http://www.new.facebook.com/policy.php?ref=pf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook

World Wide Web Privacy?

Social networks such as MySpace and Facebook started as a way to keep in touch with friends and family and to promote musical ambitions. I believe the intent was innocent. However, I feel that what once was believed to be an avenue of freedom of expression has developed into something that has great ability to completely ruin your life.

I know for a fact that employers Google your name when you apply for a job. They search all of the social networks to check on you. This serves as an extra unintended reference for a job. Even though you can set your profile to private they can still find enough facts to dismiss you, if such exist. For example, on Facebook you can be tagged in photos on other people's profile. That person may not have a private profile so now your photos are exposed. There is no such thing as privacy when it comes to the internet. Kids in high school or college may not be mature or knowledgeable enough to realize this and may end up hurting their reputation in the future.

On the flip side, many companies and organization are taking advantage of the power these social networks possess. They use it as a tool to stay up to date with what people want/need as well as a way to reach out to people.

Clearly, these networks have their pros and cons. The most important thing when it comes to using these social networks is being intelligent enough to recognize what they are.

My Fwiends and Me

One down side of getting old is that you start to miss stuff. Technology, in particular, becomes hard to keep up with. You start using, say, cell phones, and they're great; they really improve your life. Yours works just fine, so you go along and then one day, you realize 5 years have passed and NO ONE uses cell phones anymore, they've all got these sort of video cam things that work from a chip implanted into the bridge of their nose, which allows them to communicate using pure thought waves. No one under the age of 15 has ever used anything else and when you pull out your old cell phone they all giggle and stare and you think, oh crap, back to the drawing board.
Such is my relationship with social networking sites--I came late, having blown off MySpace(it always seemed like kind of a mess) and not ever really taking to Twitter. I didn't get on Facebook till March of last year, when I got an email from a guy I'd last seen when we were in 5th grade together, back in 1972, inviting me to join an online "reunion" of people I'd gone I knew at that elementary school--happy days(we moved to another neighborhood the summer before I started 6th, which was a disaster, but that's another story). So, I thought, jeez, I've got to give this a try. I opened an account, got on and low and behold, there they all were, or a lot of them--the pals I hadn't seen in some 38 years, now grown fat and wrinkled and grey. It's weird--the image you have of anyone is the way you last saw them, which in this case was of a bunch of 10-year-olds. I had to look real hard at the photos they'd posted to make out the kids I'd known so long ago, somewhere deep inside those faces.
It was kind of a revelation. They say that Facebook is for teens, but it's much more interesting when you've lived for awhile and left a lot of people behind. I've found a good many other old friends and acquaintances since then--it's comforting somehow to know they're still somewhere out there, maybe because I hate to say goodbye. But of course, finding old buddies has its limits, and once you learn the basics, you usually don't have much to say. Where I've really seen the benefits of Facebook is in my work. In a previous life, I was a minor-league alternative comic book creator and a lot of cartoonist types know about me. I started getting friend requests almost immediately and have built up a pretty good network of people all over the industry, or really, in several industries, most of whom I've never actually met. I keep up with news and hear gossip, and if I have a professional question, there's usually someone I can ask. The informal, chatty quality of Facebook is perfect for keeping in "light touch" with people, just enough so that if you really need something from them, the request won't come completely out of the blue. For someone who spends most of the time at home, alone at his drawing board or computer, Facebook has been a godsend--I spent years and years only sporadically communicating with anyone who didn't actually live with me. Facebook has also allowed me to play around with ways to present myself online, which, since I'd like to launch some kind of internet art project in the near future, is a useful exercise.
Of course, I'm wary of the dangers of Facebook, but I'm very careful about what I post or say and I haven't found it interesting enough to be worth checking more than a couple of times a day. One shouldn't mistake their FB friends for their real-life ones, but they should understand their internet buds are a different order of social circle, one with it's own limitations and possibilities. True, involvement with Facebook or any social networking site gives someone, somewhere access to information about you. But guess what? Unless you're planning to move to the wilds of Alaska and live in a plywood shack heated with kerosene and dried moose poop, they'll find ways to collect it anyway.
I fully expect, not too long from now, to turn around and realize that Facebook has been passe for longer than anyone under 10 can remember. Heck, I guess it already is: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/magazine/30FOB-medium-t.html
Oh dear. I just know I'm going to miss the boat again.

Stupid things people do on Facebook

I have a Facebook account and sometimes I'm blown away with some of the things I see posted. Not only are people giving out to much personal information, but they're not thinking.

I found an article by MSNBC that gives a great example. Someone posted a poll about assassinating Obama. The poll asked respondents "Should Obama be killed?" The choices: No, Maybe, Yes, and Yes if he cuts my health care. The question was not created by Facebook, but by an independent person using an add-on application that has been suspended from the site.

But, like any threat against the president, Secret Service agents are taking no chances and took down the poll. Facebook rep agreed to work with the Secret Service and provide any details for their investigation.

I know this will not change anything. People will still believe that what they do on Facebook is freedom of speech or harmless. This article is a great example how that is not the case. In the future, we will see more articles like this because of that attitude.

What kind of skeptic am I?


I'm in a Facebook minority. And by that I mean I'm not on Facebook. Not participating in such a powerful and ubiquitous social community may seem sacrilege for a person whose bread and butter is online media. There's a variety of reasons I have yet to sign up. Apart from getting along fine without it for 34 years, I have precious little free time for another distraction. But that's only part of the story, I don't have a lot of interest in social networking and I'm cautious about the dangers that come with publishing my thoughts to even a controlled group of friends and acquaintances. I also wonder, does it even really enhance our friendships? Here's a quote from an article about Facebook that is aligned with my point of view, "does Facebook really connect people? Doesn't it rather disconnect us, since instead of doing something enjoyable such as talking and eating and dancing and drinking with my friends, I am merely sending them little ungrammatical notes and amusing photos in cyberspace, while chained to my desk?" (1)

Four years ago I had a mySpace page. For a time, one I'm not proud of, I labored over the construction of a carefully edited persona. As if that waste of time wasn't bad enough, I was soon being contacted by people I never wanted to hear from again. Which was ultimately the reason I abandoned my mySpace page. That and the usability nightmare that made up the mySpace experience. The trauma of mySpace may have sparked my aversion to Facebook. But the more I've read about Facebook the more apprehensive I've become.

The blurry lines around privacy, the new-ness of laws regarding social networking and how publishing our opinions can impact our personal lives and careers has been a consistent theme in the Facebook stories I've read. I think that most people use social networking responsibly, but someone else's overshare could produce unexpected negative consequences. We can control what we say, but not what others are screen-capturing from our private comments and sharing with people we never want seeing them. Concerns about initiatives like Beacon and sudden changes to Terms of Service haven't helped matters either. While public outrage has undone these initiatives they have deepened my skepticism. Issues remain such as how Facebook mines quiz takers personal information and that of their friends. Extracting personal data such as politics, religion and sexuality. It's unclear how this data is used, most likely it's for sold to advertisers and marketers for targeted campaigns. However how do you know who is getting their hands on it and what they're using if for? (2)

While I'm of the belief that Facebook is not for me. I'm not opposed to social networking. I'm on LinkedIn, which demands little of my time and has served my career in positive ways. I'm not even really a detractor of Facebook. Used responsibly, I don't believe it does any more harm than people would otherwise encounter in their social lives.
Often the thought occurs to me, if everyone else is doing it and I'm not, perhaps my choice to not participate in Facebook will deny me opportunities that, in the future, I'll regret missing out on.


1. With friends like these ...
Retrieved October 18, 2009 from The Guardian UK
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jan/14/facebook

2. Facebook knows too much, ACLU says in warning of quizzes
Retrieved October 18, 2009 from PHYSORG.com
http://www.physorg.com/news170614271.html

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Facebook Catching Criminals?



Have you ever logged onto Facebook in a public location or at someone else's house and forgot to log off? I'm sure most of us have at one point. Recently a burglar did just this at the house he broke into, and it lead to his timely arrest. Facebook as we know it is mainly used for posting information and pictures about yourself that you wish to share with the world (or at least with your own group of friends). At the same time, anyone that you are "friends" with has access to all of this information.

For some reason, some users on Facebook have issues with privacy. True, there is a lot of information given out through Facebook, but it is YOU who is giving out the information. If one doesn't like a picture of themselves that someone else posted, they have full liability to tell them to remove that picture. The problem here seems to be that these law violators are posting the information that leads to their arrest. Another example addresses a real live fight, where the aftermath was recorded and traced by authorities on Facebook. Very recently, when a Kansas basketball player wrote an update referencing his school's football team negatively, a fight arose, causing that same basketball player to dislocate his thumb. Of course, his status was then updated to report his injury, which would have probably not been known by authorities otherwise.

As good as Facebook is, online social networking holds as many negative points as it does positive points. Sure, I have personally met, or become closer with, a handful of people with the help of Facebook, but it doesn't control my life. For me, Facebook is a tool for me to arrange plans with friends, instant message, and share pictures (personal or portfolio). For some people, though, it is an addiction, or in a way has become their social life. This addiction most likely explains the stupidity behind the aforementioned robber that just HAD to log into Facebook while robbing that house. I have a Facebook account and use it often, but it is surely no replacement for real life occurrences. It's all a matter of moderation.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Software to predict hits, weird.....

This has nothing to do with class, but thought it was relevant to what we've been talking about.....

CLICK HERE

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

It's Nice That


First things first, i'm a real bad blog follower (might be obvious from this blog alone). Most blogs I check are maybe on a weekly basis, possibly because they aren't updated all that often. I check some of the big ones; webdesignerwall, flight404, bestwebgallery, thefwa (considered a blog right?), but i don't really check them that often. One that I used to have a tendency to check frequently though was It's Nice That.

It's Nice That is a design blog that really focuses on a broad spectrum of design. When i first started looking at it, it was because I had an interest in the graphic design that was being showcased in the blog. Now however i have begun to notice and appreciate the wide range of fields that they draw work from. There, of course, is Graphic Design, But also digital, motion graphics, photography, sculptural, and informative discussions. The designers come from all parts of the worls and usually share a unique perspective on what design is to them. The other great thing about this blog is that it is primarily a redirect, where the blogger posts their idea on a work, but it's main goal is to redirect you to that designers page and do some promoting.

The blogs aesthetics also work well to it's advantages because it allows each piece of work to be showcased and not be influenced by the blog's design itself. I love this site because each time i come back to it there is always great content to look through, due to the fact that it is often updated multiple times everyday, perhaps up to 10 times even. This makes for a great archive of work to look through and great sources of inspiration, which i feel are essential to making a blog function as effectively as it can.

Monday, October 12, 2009

THAT Animeblog: Yeah That Guy

Whenever I look for a blog that I want to follow (religiously) there needs to be a view things that it needs to do. These "things" are to provide the latest information, user reviews, off topic sections, and a sense that the creators love what their doing. Basically a blog to me is what the internet is all about, users sharing information and opinions to other users. Being able to gain instant access to whatever you are into at the moment is amazing. Blogs are both a blessing and a curse. They show the true nature of someones feelings towards a certain subject and the person can either show gratitude or anger towards it. But let me get back to the blog that I haven't just been following for a week, more like three years.

Now I'm not going to explain anime or Japanese culture to people because that's basically what the internet is for. I came about this blog by searching for something that was up to date and constantly had arguments in the comments section of each article. I look for these two things so I have a complete understanding of different shows that are going on and I love to hear conflicting arguments between fans. Blogs are meant to cause discussion and entice users to join and this is a good example of that.

There isn't just latest show reviews or what's out now but the main team behind the blog post about their daily lives. Basically by reading the blog everyday I learned about their different opinions towards several series and the actual work that goes behind a blog. Each of the creators are either in school or graduated recently and this can be seen through separate posts. Each posts about a new episode or series seems to come directly after the poster watched the show. This authenticity helps to liven the blog up and other users make huge contributions through supplying links toward there blogs or by twittering.

Anyway yes I'm blogging about anime and yes I know peoples different opinions about it. But this blog is just like any other in that it helps to let people share their own thoughts and ideas while also letting them discover more about a hobby, design, television show, movie, book, etc. It's actually quite funny how addicted you can get to just hearing other thoughts and letting them control you into what you watch. That's why you should always find two blogs to follow religiously.

Blogs: On the Fly

Not exactly your everyday web design blog, but close enough when it comes to passion. I've always had a strong passion for the Philadelphia Flyers and up until 2007, there was no way to keep up with the Flyers on a day to day basis. Of course there were news archives but this is different. This is an interaction blog where you can read anything from they received a traffic ticket to injury updates and everything in between. It shows you when they arrived in their opponents city and how the flight was. Game recaps are always involved and its linked through twitter. The difference is is that you don't have to sit on the annoyingly status updated twitter to read the updates. Its not only on twitter and facebook, its directly on the Flyers website. With a catchy tagline "on the fly" this blog is up to date on the second. Posts run from 8 in the morning to 11 at night. As a constant reader and blogger it is extremely useful to a Flyers fan or just someone who wants to keep up with the team every once in a while. I can easily chat to flyers fans or just read a short article and move on.
Kept by digital media manager, Kevin Kurz, the blog covers everything from daily covers to multimedia and may not necessarily be the headlines in the newspaper. But this is what draws me to the site, its the insiders access without paying.

I'm Superficial

I tried reading other blogs every day. Design blogs, and media blogs. Industry-related blogs. And I do read them a few times a week - I read blogs by design firms, I read social media blogs like Mashable, and I frequent a whole bunch of blogs like Abduzeedo. But not every day. Most of them don't post every day, for one thing, but also, in my work-full-time, school-full-time, design-and-media-full-time busy life, there's only one blog I read every day.

Whether I'm stuck in traffic reading it on my iPhone, or taking a breather during class (I know, both make me a terrible person), there is one blog I rarely miss during the week. It's The Superficial, and I love it. With witty commentary on silly events, it's a break from whatever it is I'm actually involved in. It's celebrity gossip, and I hate to admit that I love it.

I guess what I learned here is that when it comes to blogs, for me, they're a break from my daily grind. I'm as busy as I've ever been in my life, and so when it comes to information in blog form, I want it to be worthless entertainment that does nothing but make me laugh, or be glad I'm not famous. And that's what The Superficial does, it provides a momentary escape from reality.

Anyway, without The Superficial, how would I find out that Miley Cyrus quit Twitter? Or the Lindsay Lohan is still certifiable? Or that Jon and Kate still exist?

Blod Posts: Smashing Magazine

As far as blogs go, the one that stands out in my mind is smashing magazine (http://www.smashingmagazine.com/). I've been a frequent to the blog for several years and have always been impressed with all of their content regarding graphics, web development and the design field in general. This week they covered topics ranging from "minimizing complexity in user interfaces" to "how to persuade your users, boss or clients".
Of all the topics covered last week my favorite covered was an article about reviewing trends in iphone app design and how they have change in the two years since the products release. It covered in depth the problems that arose with the original app design and they evolved to better incorporate the touch interface.
Overall spending a week reviewing smashing magazine was actually pretty enjoyable i tend to blog most in the early morning right after i sit down at work but right before I'm actually productive enough to open up the project i'll be spending the rest of the day on. Thinking about it now, that pre-work ritual is actually the time when get most of my random web surfing done. I check my email accounts and review any other online content that i expect would be updated for me to sift through. Aside from that which is mainly recreational, I frequent blogs mostly when im in search of some kind of tutorial or scripting information that will help me through a problem in facing in one of my projects.
As for what's next in online communications, It's hard to say i mean between blogs, email, twitter, IM, skype and the multitude of other ways in which we can communicate online a lot of the communication possibilities are already covered although their is invariably many ways to improve and optimize them which is something the future in definitely holds.



Food Blogs

This week made me realize that I never blogged on a website before. I would read some or totally skip over the blogging section. So this assignment was very different for me. I started searching for a blogs I would be interested in. So, of course I researched blogs relating to food, because I'm a true fatty. I came across a interesting blog called, Serious Eats. This is a blog post a new stories every other day or several stories in one. People blog on the different articles or recipes. Someone posted a childhood memory about how their mother made the fried egg sandwich. Their family was very poor growing up and now the sandwich is a comfort food. Overall, 55 bloggers commented on this blog and now the childhood favorite is the same from them or how they create the best sandwich.

So when do you use email, IM or a blog? Good question, for something like this a blog is a great format. In a blog setting everyone on the web gets to post there ideas or recipes. If this was a email, of course you only have address for people you know. Unless you buy a list, then you run into a risk of the email falling into someone spam folder. If not, one would get replies from family and friend, not from total strangers in another city, state or country.

What's the next step with online communication? I'm think it will be video interaction. Video communications, allowing the reviewer to see you in real time. This would work great for all IMs and blogs sites. As for emails will stay the same, but it will replace paper and letter writing completely.

Digital Design and News Blog

Since I am not following any daily blog, I usually come up with some of it after searching in Google about particular thing, so from the last week I was trying to follow one of the digital design blog and I found a really nice one.

It is about technology and Digital Design and it’s daily news, events, competitions, and resources, it’s called Dexigner ( http://www.dexigner.com/ ).I don’t know if it’s categorized as a blog but I used it as a source of information ,and it allows the user to comment on each article, the blog (or website) has several sections: Graphic, Fashion, Architecture, Digital, Art. in each one you can find the latest news about it .. I usually visit the Digital and the graphic sections, for instance yesterday post in the digital part was about the Free Photoshop Mobile App for iPhone.. and there is a free iPhone app for this website on Apple App Store.

The other blog which I usually follow it’s a political news blog ( http://www.arabnewsblog.net/ ), this blog collect the latest news from the Middle east region and the Arab world from over a 100 website and post it with the source link, I think it’s a new blog ,but it is really good in the way they gather all the daily news from the middle east and the Arab world and post it , and they are growing by the time.

bOING bIONG

One blog that I've enjoyed reading for many years is bOING bIONG. It was one of the first blogs i subscribed to when I started using an RSS readers. It is hard to describe exactly what BB is about. Wikipeadia describes the magazine that BB evolved into as "Boing Boing was an influence in the development of the cyberpunk subculture. Common themes include technology, futurism, science fiction, gadgets, intellectual property, Disney and left-wing politics." The editors post more than once a day. The reason that my Google Reader says that I have 615 unread posts is because the fact that they post so often. I became a little overwhelmed because I couldn't keep up.

I have enjoyed following BB over the last week. Most of their posts are light hearted, dealing with the strange, geeky or silly. Where else would you learn about Photos of uncomfortable chairs, Tone Balls -- dust bunnies that collect in guitar bodies, The woman who can't stop orgasming
or Invasion of the giant blobs of "sea mucus"? But there are also more politically or socially informative post dealing with technology or internet culture that you might not find anywhere else. Some recent ones include My generation: How Indie Game Makers are Embracing Controlled Chaos or Big Entertainment's century-long technophobic binge.

They do a good job of providing quirky, interesting material mixed with cultural critiques and news and information from technology and other up and coming topics. I think they describe them selves best by saying "Boing Boing: A directory of wonderful things"

All Songs Considered (NPR)

For this assignment, since I don't regularly follow one particular blog, I began my search for "electronic music production", "best music blogs" and unfortunately I came up empty handed. I mean there were blogs out there to read on these particular topics, but some of them seemed poorly updated and almost too obscure.

I eventually stumbled upon a NPR site and found a blog called "All Songs Considered" and was happy to have come across a professional, well maintained site. Over the course of the week, it has been updated regularly and although I don't care for every artist they write about, it gives a good insight onto what's happening in that world... oh and it's well written which is definitely a key, contributing element for my interests. The site is also visually pleasing and the site hierarchy isn't too bad either. You can "join" the community which allows you to post comments and receive emails to blog updates and other music information.

Blogs are a good source of information, I find out a good amount of answers on technical computer problems through searching blogs and for the most part they are correct. I think a downside to blogs are their creditability- unless you go with a "name brand" blog- who knows how true or far fetched the information could be? Another downside is a lack of commitment from the author - if people don't keep up with them or promote them, they are just wasted space online. I was happy to have came across the NPR site, not sure why I never thought to go there before this assignment.

http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns/rundown.php?prgId=37&agg=1


The Google Blog

I decided to follow the official Google blog, which posts about various topics related to searching, data organization, information architecture, or anything new from Google. Most of the posts seem to be about some new feature on a Google interface, or some small detail that was changed here or there. There were a few more interesting ones this week, however.

One in particular was called "A Tale of 10,000,000 Books," which was about Google books, the growing database of book that Google has been amassing. I thought this posting was relevant to several of the discussions we have had. Google's stated purpose for this project is to make millions of out-of-print, difficult to find works easy to find and available for everyone to read, a purpose which addresses some of the issues that Vannevar Bush discussed. The problem of having to sort through reams of content is made easier by Google's searchability; pinpointing a relevant Title is as easy as knowing what to search for and typing it. Their magic algorithms do the dirty work.

The article also discusses some of the legal issues associated with publishing and charging money to access old and esoteric books, where, in many cases, the author is gone and the copyright holders are unknown or unavailable. It was interesting to learn that in such cases, Google accumulates royalties for the mystery rights-holders, and should they ever come forward they have rights to those royalties, as well as complete priviliges to remove the work or set prices as they see fit. While this seems to be very generous of Google, it begs more legal questions: for instance, what right does Google have to publish these works when they are not the copyright holder, even if the true copyright holder is unknown? This is another large grey area, where its not clear if the social good of this project outweighs the potential legal hazards.

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Music Blogs Ruined My Life

I intended to follow a real blog last week, one that talks about politics or parenting or something. I never got around to finding one, though, so I guess I'll write about the blogs I actually do visit daily, which are ones that post old music. The thing I've discovered about the web is, whatever your interest is, no matter how peculiar, there are people out there who share it, and they are often people who are much more enthusiastic than you. My interest is music made between 1966 and 1974, particularly psychedelia and proto-metal. Since I'd rather not hear anything I've ever heard before, I'm constantly looking for new stuff. I crave it, actually--sometimes I download 2 or 3 albums a day. A lot of them aren't that great, but you never know when you'll find something to get really excited about. I visit 2 blogs with regularity, though there are 5 or 6 that I go to at least a few times a week. The one I always start at is called Drop Out Boogie(http://dropoutrecords.blogspot.com). This blog is the most consistent in terms of posting stuff I find interesting, though the blogger tends to repost things with some regularity, which isn't always a bad thing. This guy also posts a lot of information about the bands--too much, actually, but since I haven't heard of a lot of these people,the information is generally welcome. He also always includes all the album art, useful if you want to make them into cds. He puts up new music every day; in addition to the rock, he also posts a fair amount of mid-60s blues. This blog has actually gone through a number of versions--for a long time it was called "Chrisgoesrock" and later "HuddingesHill". Every few months, Blogger shuts him down, most likely for copyright complaints, but he's always up and running again in a few days.
The other blog I'm liking right now is called "Space2saviour"
(http://modadelic.blogspot.com) This guy posts a lot of the same stuff as Drop Out Boogie, but he also posts a lot of punky things and some contemporary music as well. Generally, his selections have a harder, more underground edge. All the records are accompanied by descriptions written in a strange, sort of old beatnik kind of voice which can be kind of irritating but which sets a not-inappropriate mood, once you get used to it. This blogger posts almost every day; the only thing I really don't like about him is that he doesn't indicate the year the album came out.
There are a bunch of other blogs I check a lot and if I really want to waste time, all of the blogs have links to other blogs. I surf for music more than I'd like to admit--working at home by yourself all day is far more difficult if you're prone to procrastination. I wish this activity was good for my business or helped with work I actually have to do; I wish the people I live with liked this music or at least didn't always complain when I play it in the kitchen or the car.
But it is my fate to live at the mercy of my compulsions, when it's all said and done, I suppose it could be worse.

Dumb as a blog

Since I'm really not a huge fan of blogs (my short attention span and memory don't allow me to remember to follow them) I wanted to follow something that would be humorous and keep my attention. The blog I followed is called "Dumb as a Blog: A Daily Digest of the Dumbest Stuff People Do" (http://blog.trutv.com/dumb_as_a_blog/). I guess the stories mentioned in this blog are sad in a way because they're true.

The author covers topics that range from dumbest criminals of the week to the latest dumb trends like dog lingerie. Yes, you read that correctly DOG LINGERIE! On October 8th the blog talked about Stephanie Hull, 18, who used a stolen cell phone and called a bomb threat to her high school that triggered a lockdown. Apparently she didn't realize that a cell phone can act as a GPS and pinpoint your exact location. She was busted and faces up to four years in prison.

I am a big fan of the Darwin Awards so this blog was right up my alley. Still, it never seizes to amaze me how stupid people can be. It's scary actually.

Blog on a Blog


Ok. So my blog ended up not posting everyday so i decided to pick the 7 most recent posts. I was looking through all of the philly blogs that are linked to uwishuknew and I found one called Broad and Market that i found very interesting. Broad and Market is a blog about street style from Philly. What I loved about this blog is that Maggie (the creator) goes up and talks to random people on the streets of Philly about their style. She documents their conversation and lets you read it word for word. She says she wants to document "the personal style, the character of the people that call Philadelphia home" (About). I like that, I like reading about people here in my city. On saturday Queen Sumiyah Mu' El was the focus. Her outfit was African and very colorful. She said she was part of the Moorish Cherokee clan in North Central Philly. How cool is that?!?!
Then a few days earlier Sol Jung from Tokyo was at Clark Park carrying a basket and claiming that her newest obession is high heels. I don't know why, but little details about people like this are kinda interesting to me, especially when it's in Philly.
Then there was Bernadette the Brunette from Jersey/South Philly. She had some bangin glasses and a sweet tat on her upper arm.
The Broad and Market link : http://cyborgmemoirs.com/street/

Saturday, October 10, 2009

David Dillon Photography


My general interests lately, slightly outside the realm of web and digital design, have been geared towards photography. I have just recently been setting up a minor in photography for myself here at Phila U, and also just purchased a Canon DSLR. Naturally, I am inclined to know the nature of my new camera in and out, reading up on the manuals, bodies, lenses, shooting modes, lighting, etc.

I want to start off by saying I am currently not an avid follower of any particular blog. In doing the research for this class, I feel constantly looking at a photography blog would be excellent for my current interests. I stumbled across a guy named David Dillon, who is a self-taught, but professional photographer.

Every day (just about) David posts a new picture, usually with a blurb underneath telling a little bit about the photo's location or intent. In David's about me section he refers to himself as a self-taught photographer that has been taking pictures for about five years. He has gotten into photography due to his general interest in the area, and has made not just a hobby and stress-reliever out of it, but a career as well. He also lists every camera body, lens, printer, scanner, and accessory he uses for his work.

As a spotlight photographer from the popular photoblog vfxy, David's blog is perfect for someone like me who wants to understand what I am doing with such an intimidating camera in hand, but also to appreciate the art and angles in photography. An extremely useful bit of information that I have noticed that David adds to his blog is a "picture information" section listed under every single picture in the blog. This is extremely helpful to me, considering it lists specs such as shutter speed, focal length, camera used, iso, and more. These facts are hard to understand currently, considering I have really used my camera twice so far. But I am already starting to understand all these specifics that mean a huge deal in the world of photography. I hope by following a blog of such caliber, it will allow me to more fully understand how to take amazing photography of my own.


Friday, October 9, 2009

Abduzeedo design blog

A blog website that I spend a lot of time on is Abduzeedo.com. The blog is from a Portuguese designer named Fabio Sasso who by a strange coincidence shares my last name. I doubt we're related however. Abduzeedo reports design trends, sources inspiration, interviews designers, and offers design tutorials with free source files. It's updated at least daily by a small group of contributors. Mostly I visit the blog to source inspiration. The inspiration comes in a variety of forms, art, illustration, architecture, photography, packaging, typography, logos, advertising, graffiti, fashion, websites and anything else the contributors come across that's relevant to design. I followed the website for this post from 9/27 to 10/3. There was 29 posts on Abduzeedo in just that week.

A regular feature on the site is the daily inspiration post. Here's some of the gems I found throughout the week:









The blog offers a user friendly way to share sourced inspiration with others. You can drag an image into a dashboard that pops up in a div layer that allows you to email the image, send it to facebook, twitter or IM. Unfortunately there was no way I could figure out how to screencap this to show you. Here's a Daily Inspiration page if you're interested in trying it for yourself.


The week I studied the blog, a student shared his package design project in a blog post. His assignment was to redesign the Doritos packaging. Inspired by origami, paper tessellation and referencing Mexican totem poles here's what he came up with:








Another post was dedicated to design book recommendations. Some recommended books included, "How To Be a Graphic Designer Without Losing Your Soul" - a book that offers career guidance to get the most out of being a designer, "The Art of Looking Sideways" - a book that offers a wide range of inspiration, and a book I own called "Creative Advertising: Ideas and Techniques from the World's Best Campaigns" which explores ways to come up with ideas using successful ad campaigns as case studies.

Abduzeedo, in my humble opinion, is an outstanding design focused blog. It's apparent by the volume and quality of the posts that the people behind it are passionate about design and happy to share what they find and create.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

hypermedia

Technology has always moved us forward and if there was a captain it'd be hypermedia. When I first had a cell phone there was no picture messaging, video messaging, and I wasn't even thinking about connecting to Facebook via a 3 inch screen. But in retrospect, this allows me to receive and send information in a small package and for someone to receive it in a matter of seconds. Whether its texting or I need to reply to an email immediately its all in my pocket.
Although all that information is good, we are losing person to person transactions. Honestly, if I need to get in contact with someone and discuss business I'd probably end up calling, texting, or emailing them. All through technology, which results in this information overload that happens everyday. Search something on Google and you get 1 billion results in a matter of 3.2 seconds. Try it, I just did. Am I going to go through these 1 billion results? No. But it gives you so much extra information about every single word you searched all through hypermedia.
So there are ups and downs of hypermedia, it makes things easier but in the future it may hurt the everyday contact we have today.

Hypermedia

Hypermedia has brought us into the future it has stream lined thought and allowed learned people the world over to work and collaborate in a way not before possible. As Vannevar Bush predicts in his article it allows for massive amount of information to become truly useful to the people who would need them. His example of Mendel's concept of the Laws of genetics which was lost for a generation certainly wouldn't have been the case if google was around to find it. Today we have an infinite amount of knowledge available to use a mouse click away. Any informational channel we could imagine can be found and explored through the resources of the internet and it only keep improving. As more reliable data makes its way online and improvements in search engines advance the Internet has become a collection of human knowledge that we can reference and learn from upon command... In other words its Vannevar's prediction and vision come true.
While it is very obvious as to how hypermedia has greatly advanced and helped our society through the rapid exchange of thought, what is its con? I defiantly agree with Anna's post in that the biggest problem with hyper media is that it can be extremely overwhelming when your search returns 2 million results. Where do you begin?.. and then another issue arrises in that of those infinite number of results what number is reliable fact and what part is falsified or part of some other internet garbage. Over all its obvious that hypermedia has been a great asset to humanity but it like everything else must be taken with a grain of salt.

Monday, October 5, 2009

How the future will be: 1940's edition

When I started reading the article by Vannevar Bush I actually didn't initially read the by the editor section and didn't know that it was written in 1946. While reading it, without knowing that important information, I thought that the author was very strange in how much he thought technology would be such a helping hand to us. When people read about the almighty computer they usually see that the end of the world is coming or that we are becoming lazier due to increasing technology. I then went back to the beginning of the article and saw that it was written in the 40's. This helped to explain a lot and soon I saw that scientists during the time of the Great Wars were basically scared of their own inventions. They felt that their only purpose was for destruction and death. But Bush brings up a good point in the beginning of the article in that these people of great intellect need to come together and create.

Not all of Bush's predictions make complete sense, he basically thinks that everything will either be really small or that everyone can fix their machines. Towards the end of the article you see the early predictions of both hypermedia and multimedia. He begins to say that soon there will be too much data and it needs to be stored somewhere. But all of these predictions due detract from the one big issue "war". Since this article was made during the time directly after world war II it is understandable that he wasn't thinking of anymore wars. But war is what produces huge progressions in technology and sadly that's where all the technology that Bush predicted is going towards.

In The Future, We'll All Have Big Desks


It's always fun to read 60-year-old predictions for the future. And, of course, Dr. Bush is uncannily accurate, at least when describing the type of device a computer would eventually become, if not the means by which it would operate. Of course, there were computers that existed even then..the Univac, wasn't it? Nope, just googled it and it looks like it didn't become operative till '51. Well, that's just 2 years later. I saw a piece of it in the Smithsonian a few years ago. Lots of vacuum tubes, always exciting if you're a fan of old electronics.Well, information is certainly more accessible these days, even more so than Bush envisioned. What he doesn't seem to have considered is that, like a highway widened to accommodate more traffic which only ends up being just as congested a few years later because the new ease of travel just attracted more cars, the ability to access information easily just created more of it. I'm not sure, in the end, it's easier to sort out data now than it used to be when it was harder to get. But it's certainly easier to get a picture of a gas station if you want to draw one and don't want to have to drive to the corner and make a sketch.Bush's contraption, as much as it resembles in many ways what we have today, is basically a glorified file cabinet--the owner would find his information the traditional way and microfilm it. The thing Bush really couldn't envision was the limitless info-realm of the internet, heaving out there like an ocean, with every sort of media heretofore devised instantly accessible from anyone's laptop. I mean, the guy hadn't even really experienced TV yet. We are, truly, a new version of human being.

Thinking...

The article was very interesting - It's always almost surreal for me to become immersed in the predictions of someone from history. The fact that their predictions are about the time I live in is eerie when their predictions have come true, and amusing when they're off the mark. It's like reading Orwell's 1984, and resting assured that his vision of the future hasn't become a reality... yet.

I think the value in reading something like this is that it reminds us to look at our current environment with the same critical eye. In my opinion, the predictions and assumptions are not too much more than looking at the existing technology and thinking about it logically, critically. Bush says himself, "It would be a brave man who would predict that such a process will always remain clumsy, slow, and faulty in detail."

I guess for me, what I get out of this is that we should all be thinking critically of the technology around us - what we use, what we think we will use, what may fall by the wayside, and what may become a major piece of the future landscape moving forward. 10 years ago electric cars were a joke, and now hybrids are everywhere. Instead of being immersed in the technology we use to the point where we can't imagine where it will - or could - go, we should be able to see it from a critical point of view. It'll be us, after all, who takes it to it's next level.

As We May Be Wrong

Upon reading “As We May Think” by Vannevar Bush I was very impressed and at times quite bored with the level of detail that he went into describing the problems and potential future solutions to the issues of his day. Most of what he described in his article was related to recording, organizing, processing, sorting and transferring information. The most fascinating part to me was that no mater how thoughtful, and detailed his ideas were, they were all completely useless.

All of Bush’s plans and musings were based on analogue technologies. Using film, punch cards and other such methods have now, in what has become the future, been completely eclipsed by the computer and digital storage of data. Bush was hoping that as scientist work progressed they would make higher resolution microfilm with 100 times the data density of current film, “dry” photography with out the need for liquid chemicals and a new symbolism to allow machines to be able to calculate everyday decisions for us. In the end we didn’t need any of these devices. Bush was barking up the wrong tree.

It is interesting to contrast Bush’s article with the video on Otlet’s vision. Otlet’s ideas were much closer to the system in which we currently organize and communicate information today. While Bush imagined we would all possess highly mechanized desk what would store thousands of sheets of high resolution microfilm Otlet imagined we would possess devices that would be able to access and view information that would be stored remotely and only be called up as we requested it. He even imagined video and audio being integrated into the viewer.

Since 1945 a lot has changed. It is easy to think that since Bush ended up so wrong there is no point in speculate about the direction that technology will take us in the future. Just like Bush got a lot of thing wrong, he and Otlet got a lot of things right. One of the most important things that I noticed in Bush’s article are his thoughts on how humans organize data. He even suggest that is memex records data using what he called trails. He recognized that the brain work by association, not in hierarchies. His most valuable incite came from when he focused on the way human’s use machines and not on the technology itself. That is something that is very important for us to remember as digital designers.

Pros and cons of hypermedia

Clearly hypermedia has many advantages. It is now easier than ever to find any type of information necessary. Are you writing a research paper and need references? Google it or find a book online. There is no need to drive to a library. You can even subscribe to medical journals and research papers online. If you want to learn anything you can most likely find a "how to" on the internet.

As I think about the grand accessibility to information over the internet I can't help but think...is there such a thing as too many choices? It's significantly easier to make a decision if you have 3 options versus hundreds. Continuing with my previous example of a research paper... say you need references. You may attend a library and find a few books you can use. You know where to go and what to look for. Nowadays you can try search your topic online and be presented with thousands of possible answers. How do you know where to begin? You can't possibly read through everything.

I feel that with hypermedia it is easy to get overwhelmed by the amount of information available. We become so flooded with choices and information (true or false). At what point do we become overloaded and regress back to a book?

Dr. Bush

While reading this article I had to keep reminding myself of the time and context under which it was written. I felt it necessary to picture a man with a personal scribe in an oil lamp lit room pondering future events. I know this is quite dramatic and even off the mark a bit, but the context of the piece is what made the reading interesting for me. If anything, this piece painted a picture of the world in which my grandparents participated. And as you know, that world, especially in terms of technology is vastly different.

As Andrew stated in his blog entry, Dr.Bush was pretty spot on with a lot of his predictions. It's amazing to me that there were people back in those days thinking about how we would compile and search the large amount of information that is presented to us. His predictions about specialization and compression of information are true. One can definitely draw distinct parallel's to the internet and his Memex (memory+index) concept and hypertext. The video link was also a prediction of how people would access information in the future, I found those visuals almost surreal.

I think the old cliche' "always remember where you come from" holds true in both personal and professional endeavors. These history lessons reminds us of our progress and what the technology sector was once like. These minds were a large part of making what our digital world is like today. They weren't concerned with individual perseverance- it seems their work and research was geared more towards bettering man and our society.

I also think the readings serve as a means of inspiration. Think big. The concepts we develop can of course seem non-executable or outlandish now, but just imagine the reaction some of these minds may have faced when they presented their ideas. The world is now familiar with technology and we embrace new and exciting ideas. Designers in the digital space have the ability to shape, mold, and predict the future of their medium.

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Hypermedia

Over the past few years we have seen a significant increase in hypertext and hypermedia tools; the variety of hypermedia products now available is quite impressive and it seems we are constantly adding newer and even more innovative hyper systems.

I think hypermedia helped us more than it hurts. Some advantages of the hypermedia is: the ability to quickly follow information and look up for material, store large amounts of information, It can provide better visual prominence and more rapid navigation through huge number of entries. Most users refer to dictionaries, encyclopedias, and training manuals as part of more extended tasks. They would like to save their results and queries for future use, the ability to transfer quotes to other documents.

Even though the way of browsing through the hypermedia might increase the risk that the learner skips through the material much to hasty, and thus get a shallow and fragmented conception of the subject.

Hypermedia



Advancements in technology have leveled the playing field. Creating, for the most part, egalitarian access to much of the collective knowledge of mankind. Digital technology has afforded a more dynamic version of Vannevar Bush's memex than perhaps he could have ever imagined. As parts of Vannevar Bush's prophetic hypermedia vision of the future become reality, how has it affected us?


Bush envisioned small devices that could carry a disproportionately massive amount of data accessible to anyone. A digital version of Bush's vision has been realized but not without a cost. We live in a society of increasing complexity. Understanding it has been aided by the access provided by digital technology, but at the cost of overwhelming options to do so. For example, it's not as simple as going online to get information. Information comes through a lot of different channels and their own unique filters. While the access available is immediate, the rate of gain of that information (Hick's Law) is reduced by the decision making required in the process (1). Or to say it more plainly, we're horribly distracted by all of our options.


Spawned from digital connectivity, social networking has

created a culture of over-sharing and a willing abandonment of privacy. While social networking has great merits, it's turned all of us into publishers at the peril of how our published content and even our associations can affect our careers, our relationships and even our safety.


But this isn't meant as a condemnation of Bush's advocacy of mass information. I'm of the opinion that these are the growing pains of the information age. In time we'll learn how to best leverage the new power we've acquired. To do so however we must always be thinking about how to simplify along the way. All along, keeping in mind the best experience for the end user. Going back to Donald Norman's analog versus digital argument, we need to reverse the trend of adapting to digital technology to digital technology adapting to us.


1. Hick's Law, From Wikipedia

Retrieved October 10, 2009, from Wikipedia website:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hick's_law

Hypermedia

Wiki states that hypermedia is used as a logical extension of the term hypertext in which graphics, audio, video, plain text and hyperlinks intertwine to create a generally non-linear medium of information.

Hypermedia makes it easier to process and organize the world's information. In a matter of seconds, images, text, music, and video are available by request. Weinberg wrote, "We have been forced to move from atoms to bits." Which it true, imagine now how much room space we are save by omitting shelves of books and placing all information at our figure tips.

But, for every positive idea, there is a negative one. Hypermedia makes things too easy. Currently, we have information overload on the web. Everyone and their mama can post information to the web that is true or false. This overload affect the quality of information by degrading it. Also accessing other peoples personal information is another easy function. With a simple Google search, one can find anyone's home phone number, home address, work location, direct work number, salary, email addresses, married name or maiden, relatives, or personal photos. This opens up a perfect opportunity for web crimes and identity fraud.

As We May Think

"The investigator is staggered by the findings and conclusions of thousands of other workers—conclusions which he cannot find time to grasp, much less to remember, as they appear" (As we may think 1). I feel that this is still somewhat the case today. Although now everyone is adding to the mass of information that is the internet. Bush's idea of the memex, a place where a person can easily create trails of information for others to follow has culminated into the world of hypermedia. Even though it is easier to find information then it once was, the world of hypermedia is still drowning people in an excess of information. A person still needs to pick and choose and now it is up to them to try and find what is actually accurate information as well. Since everyone has access to their own "memex" and "trailmaking", there is a lot more useless information within all the hypermedia. In this way I feel that hypermedia has hurt us, overwhelming people with useless information. But on the other hand, it has allowed for even the most insignificant person to have a part in contributing to the records. It has allowed users to be active and not just passive beings sucking in information.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Untapped Human Potential

There are those of us that dedicate our lives to scientific discovery and invention, and those of us that are completely oblivious to the world around us. Most of us fit comfortably in between these two extremes: Einstein and Paris Hilton, respectively, if you will. The average person gauges leisure with fun, as shown by the eight hour work day. A work overload seems sometimes counterproductive.

The passage read and video seen for this week's lecture are obviously geared towards technological advancements and future predictions from two well-learned individuals. They both had a lot to say, and got a fair amount right. One passage that stuck out to me was this:

"If the aggregate time spent in writing scholarly works and in reading them could be evaluated, the ratio between these amounts of time might well be startling. this sort of catastrophe is undoubtedly being repeated all about us, as truly significant attainments become lost in the mass of the inconsequential." - Vannevar Bush

As stated, only a handful of people get recognized, when there may be theories from ten other great minds that have never been discovered. Bush also states that Mendel's concept of the laws of genetics was not found or understood for a generation's time, being lost and consumed in the masses of theoretical scholarly work. Is it this sense of leisure that holds the human race back from making scientific strides slower than our 'fullest potential'? Or are we better off limiting work time with leisure?

Considering this argument between leisure and science, there has always existed a parallel argument between science and the existence of religion. It is in our curious nature as humans to not only further our endless knowledge and untapped ability, but to also discover our roots. This is where many people turn to religion; to let faith root their origins. But, nothing personal, what if religion never existed? The always controversial cartoon series Family Guy attacked that question in their most recent episode Road to the Multiverse (click for a soundclip). Stewie and Brian find themselves traveling to different parallel universes, one where Christianity and "the dark ages of science" never existed, leaving our world in seemingly much better shape than it is now. So faith, to many, seems like the blind leading the blind into outdated traditions that often seem to fight science. To many others, religion guides and control his or her life.

So, are we really behind the point that we should be, or is this just the way of life? After all, as quoted famously from The Shining, "all work and no play makes Jack a dull boy".

Friday, October 2, 2009

My Memex

On reading Bush's essay I was struck by how his predictions ranged from eerily accurate, to ridiculously off the mark. There are elements of today's reality within all of his predictions, but there are also elements that seem comically antiquated, revealing the mental hurdles that many decades ago were still quite difficult to leap. In general, Bush seemed to have an uncanny understanding of problems associated with the rapid expansion of technology that he saw during WW2, and he could also clearly see the principles that would need to be adopted in order to address those problems.

We have the luxury today of living in a digital world, even if most of us are ignorant of how it really works. The metaphysical existence of content, stored as binary information, is a difficult concept to grasp by any standard, and it is easy to talk about the contents of our computers as if they do physically exist somewhere, like a book or a reel of film. The ever-expanding reams of content that Bush predicted is certainly true today; there are more options for collecting and generating information then he would have ever imagined. Ironically, though, his idea that data would be stored on masses of microfilm has come and gone, and to us even today seems antiquated. I think the primary obstacle to Bush's thinking was an inability to foresee how digital information could play a part in the communication of the future. He certainly hints at the use of logic machines and magnetic data storage, but he was, I think, conceptually stuck, believing that perceptual information like imagery and sound would still be stored in analog perceptual media (like the tiny images he mentions often), and that the primary use of digital data would be for seemingly abstract computation to supplement that content.

Nonetheless, Bush's essay is fascinating in its conceptual accuracy, even if his descriptions of the future are a bit off. I think we are reading it because it is a lesson to all of us not to get hung up on the technologies of the day. On several occasions, Bush essentially says "we can't do this today, but I'm sure we'll figure it out soon." Its this optimism and willingness to look past our culture's technical inadequacies and focus on broad principles that will enable us to innovate in the most interesting and useful ways.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Assignment for 10/6

Project Topics are due 10/13. Email me your ideas.

Read:
Vannevar Bush: As we may think: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/194507/bush

Watch:
Assignment:
Blog about why you think you were asked to read this article

OR
How has hypermedia helped us, hurt us

Monday, September 28, 2009

Copyright: Right or Wrong

Technology allows copyright infringement to happen a lot more and a lot faster. Napster for instance allowed people, including me, to download and share files in a matter of seconds. In fact, somebody would get mad if it took more than a minute to download. What's to protect anything you create? Laws yes, but people can get past them illegally clearly. Ever seen those pictures that have a words across them? It's probably the smartest way to do it to stop stealing.
Personally, I feel as if Fairey did not illegally take the photo since he claims he was in contact with campaign officials. A lot of people would also say that since the poster was so successful that claims weren't followed through to the fullest. So is that to say that if you steal and your successful enough with the right crowd is it not stealing? Possibly. Personally I believe that if you take a photo for a project, cite it. Its just like a quote for an essay, you have to cite it or fail.
Copyright infringement is definitely morally wrong, but still happens. A lot of people that steal another's idea isn't even published so its not a big deal. Even file sharing only takes out of the million dollar artist pockets. Serious stealing is happening through program sharing and such things as the Obama Hope poster. But program stealing is being prevented by CD's copyright protection and only being allowed to install once. Which further provokes users to go to Kazaa, Napster, Limewire, or any other program that allows file sharing.

Intellectual Propery: Here We Go Again

The digital world has greatly changed since it's initial creation and has also changed the way people live. People are able to send information over a great distance in a short amount of time and also post whatever they like. This information can vary between pictures to music and this is where the problem starts. Soon this information can't be controlled and people so a huge hole in the internet and were able to slip through it. Movies, TV shows and even video games were able to be collected from free anywhere. Peer to Peer sites appeared overnight and the government wasn't ready for this new change.

The intellectual property basically protects specific rights that an owner has for his property. This basically allows these users to protect their special "property" for ever if they keep on renewing their copyright. I completely understand that these people wouldn't want fakes being sold for profit by other people. But this can be seen as someone being proud of the original authors work or trying to get money in a cheap way. All of this boils down to different types of media and how they are stolen in the digital world. When someone finds an art piece they like they'll slap it on their desktop. But when someone finds a movie or music they like for free they'll take it right away. I feel that the art piece on the desktop is ok but stealing movies and music can get sticky. Ever since the bubble burst by Napster (ah the old days) the government has tried to strengthen it's grip on illegal transfers more websites seem to pop up.

I can't just protect the illegal downloaders (even though I'm one) because they are stealing someones own thoughts and ideas. This lose of hard work does make sense but the prices that are set do get out of hand. This people that steal are taking a product that they love and by litteray putting them in the poor house the intial product loses it's real meaning. Musicians can be seen as the true culprits by completely attacking the pirates (illegal downloaders) their own fans lose faith in them.

There is a need for regulation on the inernet but since it was founded on communications people won't take kindly to being held down. People who have been raised with the internet understand how much they can receive for free out of it and will probably never want to look back. There are some good ideas out there such as itunes or even hulu but everyone always likes more stuff and controlling that will be hard.

When does your work, become their work?


Yes, yes, i know this is not Shepard Fairey's actual Hope piece, but that is my point. Shepard Fairey received a lot of grief for his use of the Washington Post's (i think) photograph, but this work obviously resembles the original work far more then Fairey's work yet who has heard any commotion about this piece. ( This is hardly the only version either, I feel like because of the hype about this piece it has lead to even more adaptations then would have occurred naturally.)

Intellectual property rights and the concept of ownership in a digital world is diminishing at a rapid rate. While earlier examples, such as perhaps Andy Warhol using Campbell's Soup or Monroe's portrait, displayed the beginning attempts at "Fair Use" of others work; The internet and digital formats in general have tested the limits of Fair use.

Shepard Fairey has received some of the latest pressures brought on by those dead set on believing that their work is theirs. Before arguing if he is right in doing what he did though, I think it is first necessary to point out that it was not even the photographer of the picture who sued Fairey for property rights, but the newspaper that the photo was captured for. Considering that they had no creative "ownership" of the photograph, it seems odd to even think that they could feel they were cheated out of or imposed upon when Fairey decided to use this photograph in his work.

But obviously the real argument lies in Ownership of an original source, not who created it. Shepard Fairey, in my opinion, had every right to create and sell his interpretation of President Obama from the newspaper's photograph. Not only did he successfully bring his own creativity to the work, but I feel the subject matter plays an important role in this discussion. The argument revolves solely around the fact that he used this image as a reference for his work, but the image is of a political, public figure.

I hate to quote what I'm about to quote, but in the movie Ironman, one character says "You think just because you came up with an idea it makes it yours?" but i think his is very appropriate to this discussion. In today's digital world, the ownership of ideas is being tested every second. For clarification, I DO NOT agree with the quote and I do feel that artists are entitled to feel a sense of security in their productions. However I do think that many people lose site of the bigger picture, that creation is meant to inspire and not to be kept to yourself locked in a safe.

In my opinion, the greatest accomplishment for an artist would be to have their work sampled and used in another artists work, purely because that means that you have done something truly inspirational in all aspects of the word. The only issue I feel is appropriate to argue is recognition and accreditation of the original artist. If this is denied and they attempt to claim all credit for the origin of the work then that work HAS in fact been stolen.
Basically it boils down, in my opinion, to if the original author of a work is given credit for being the inspiration for a re-work. If credit is given then the re-work is completely in accordance with Fair Use and should be able to be used commercially. But if accreditation isn't given then this re-work has effectively stolen it's concept and tried to pass itself off as it's own work entirely.

(As a side note, ironically, Queen "Under Pressure" was just playing on my radio and all i could think about was back to a VH1 video of Vanilla Ice claiming that "Ice Ice Baby" was entirely original and his own work. This is a case where I would say the work was stolen, because recognition was not given where it was due.)